Coca-Cola rethinking their US distribution plan
There was an interesting article in the 4/17/13 edition of the Wall Street Journal. If you subscribe, you can find the article here. The headline was “New Coke: Bottlers Are Back”
Basically the article was about Coca-Cola’s recent change in direction where it is now gradually getting out of the distribution business, again. Some quotes from the article explain this: (underlining and highlights are mine)
“Coca-Cola Co. likes to have its cake and eat it too.
That is why it sold its bottlers and then bought them back again. That is why it is now going back to the franchise model for distribution.
In a deal that would allow it to keep vast amounts of control over its business, Coke said it reached an agreement in principle to expand territorial distribution rights to five independent bottling partners. That would reduce Coke's direct control over its U.S. distribution only to about 75% from 80% currently. The company said more such deals are on the way as it backs out of the delivery business.
"You need to walk before you run,'' said Muhtar Kent, Coke's chief executive, in an interview, of the step-by-step approach.
In 2010, Coca-Cola Co. paid $12.3 billion to buy its biggest U.S. bottler in order to secure control of most production and distribution in its home market. Now, this latest approach will allow it to keep production of popular brands including Sprite, Powerade, Minute Maid and Coke in-house but gradually parcel out distribution once again.
The move is a delicate balancing act by Coke, which is trying to keep a tight grip on how its drinks are made and sold while shedding the capital-intensive business of maintaining delivery trucks, routes and warehouses. Coke also is seeking to boost sagging profit margins in the U.S., where soda consumption has fallen eight straight years.
Coke's share price surged 5.7% Tuesday to close at $42.37 on the New York Stock Exchange as Wall Street applauded the model even as the company reported a decline in first-quarter profit and revenue.
The Atlanta-based company's move could prompt PepsiCo Inc., PEP +4.13% its main beverage rival, to speed up its own review of its operations. PepsiCo paid $7.8 billion in 2010 to acquire two large independent bottlers, also giving it direct control of most of its U.S. beverage manufacturing and distribution.
Coke currently has about 70 small bottling partners manufacturing and delivering about 20% of its drinks in the U.S. Tuesday's announced deal would increase the scale of five of them…
But unlike past distribution deals, some of which stretch back generations, Coke isn't giving the bottlers perpetual rights to the new territories. Instead, bottlers would be given 10-year licenses for any new real estate, which then need to be renewed. The initial deals with the five bottlers aren't expected to close until 2014.
Mr. Kent said a lot has changed since Coke began striking U.S. distribution deals for its famous cola roughly a century ago. At the time, territories were determined by how far horse-driven carriages could travel in a single day. The new distribution deals are "moving us into the 21st century,'' he added.
Selling off distribution rights could earn Coke a lot of cash. Consumer Edge Research estimates that the 80% share of U.S. distribution rights currently owned outright by Coke to be worth around $9.5 billion.
Coke isn't ready to surrender control over manufacturing, though, planning instead to further integrate bottling operations around the country. Manufacturing of Coke products currently is spread over hundreds of facilities.
Mr. Swartzberg said he wouldn't be surprised if Coke eventually also sells majority stakes in the manufacturing part of the business a few years down the road.”
My first reaction is to notice that same old big business trend… new management has to do “new” things. Team X comes in and decides outsourcing is the key… after they leave Team Y comes in and decides insourcing is obviously the right call. Can’t just stand there, you’ve got to do something!
But this change is pretty big news. Coke has found (and it seems Pepsi might be following) that the distribution end of their business is better done by others. I completely understand their desire to control the production (it is after all THEIR product) but they have found the “capital-intensive business of maintaining delivery trucks, routes, and distribution” is perhaps not their strongest suit.
Soft drinks are like beer, they require a lot of feet on the street and a smaller, more local private company driving this effort seems to be a superior choice. I hope some of those craft brewers think about this… are they craft brewers or are they distribution companies who happen to brew beer? Strategically these are WAY different beasts. Et tu Brito?
In fact in other parts of the world, Coke has already divested itself of both distribution AND manufacturing… they let other specialists take care of that. They want to retain control and make money. Pretty simple.
Also interesting that these franchises aren’t perpetual but rather with a fixed time frame. Coke wants to ensure IT ultimately controls them, regardless of who actually owns the thing. Again, I understand their desires. Might we see something like this taking hold in the beer business? I’d be surprised if we didn’t.
Of course there are many differences between soft drinks and beer but as many organizations have found, specialization often leads to better performance. Let the local guys deal with the warehousing, delivery, and merchandising needs (by definition these are local activities, they must be) while the big dogs focus on getting a great product produced and marketed. Then pass the ball to the local guy and let them take it to the street.
Sure makes sense to me… and obviously to Coke and Pepsi too.